- The process seems overwhelming and they do not know how to appeal,
- They do not think an appeal is likely to be successful,
- They think their home’s assessed value is below market value and there is no basis for appealing,
- They do not understand they can appeal on unequal appraisal,
- They are busy and do not want to set aside time, given the presumption that “you can’t fight city hall”.
- The notice of assessed value can get lost in the mail,
- A notice of assessed value is not necessary unless your assessed value increases by more than $1,000, and
- You should appeal annually
“at least 14 days before hearing on a protest, the chief appraiser shall: … inform the property owner that the owner or the agent of the owner may inspect and may obtain a copy of the data, schedules, formulas, and all other information the chief appraiser plans to introduce at the hearing to establish any matter at issue.”The property tax code further provides the chief appraiser the right to charge up to $15 for each residence, and up to $25 for each commercial property owner for this information. However, there are limits on the cost per page an appraisal district can charge. Practically speaking, the maximum charge is $1 to $2 for a residence. In Harris County, most homeowners can print this information from the appraisal district’s web site once an appeal has been filed using the “I file” system. This section of the tax code was added in 1991, but many appraisal districts have attempted to ignore this section of the property tax code for years and some still do. After discussing this section of the Texas Property Tax Code on a radio show in 2005, several listeners called back a week or two later to report certain appraisal districts were claiming to be unaware of this section. When O’Connor & Associates sent House Bill 201 requests to appraisal districts in 2005, some called us and said “what do you mean you want our information, we plan to use your information at the hearing to prove our value.” While these examples seem quaint and cute, it is surprising that 15 years after taxpayer friendly legislation has been passed, that appraisal districts are still ignoring property owners and tax consultants who ask for this information. There are at least seven reasons to utilize House Bill 201 to obtain the information the appraisal district will use at the hearing:
- It is an effective way to obtain information regarding both market value and unequal appraisal for your property tax appeal,
- You will receive the appraisal district’s information regarding the size, condition and other qualitative and quantitative data for your house,
- The information can be obtained for a nominal cost,
- It is helpful to know what information your adversary will be able to use at the hearing,
- Making the request limits what information the appraisal district can present at the hearing. If you do not request their information prior to the hearing, they can use any information available to them at the hearing. However, if you request the appraisal district information using a House Bill 201 request, they may only use information previously provided to you,
- If they do not provide you information on market value or unequal appraisal in the House Bill 201 request, you win by default at the ARB hearing, and
- In many cases, the appraisal district House Bill 201 information clearly supports a lower value.
- Is the year built accurate?
- Are the qualities and amenities accurate?
Read more about Preparing for the Hearing. Read more about The Hearing Process.
Patrick O’Connor, a designated member of the Appraisal Institute, is president of O’Connor & Associates. The firm, in business since 1974, specializes in real estate appraisals, research, and state and federal tax reduction services nationwide. With offices in Houston, Dallas, Los Angeles and Newport Beach, the firm employs more than 180 people. Patrick O’Connor is frequently acknowledged by national publications as a respected source of information on real estate. Visit www.cutmytaxes.com. Copyright by O’Connor & Associates, 2006

Comments are closed.